Most 911 conpiracy theorists agree that Bush and his administration either allowed or planned the "events" of 9/11/2001. The motivation here was to increase Bush's power and authority over the people of the United States. But if we are to reject claims that bin Laden and his organization were soley responsible for the attacks, then shouldn't we examine how those motivations could've driven other major players and possible conspirators? I have done this, and come to the inescapable conclusion that if wasn't Bin Laden... it must've been Clinton.
Here are the facts:
The Clinton administration was heavily engaged military nation-building in the post-cold war world, most notably in southern Europe, where we subordinated our troops to the United Nations. Candidate Bush promised to reverse that trend, stating in the 2000 debates that "The vice president and I have a disagreement about the use of troops. He believes in nation-building. I would be very careful about using our troops as nation builders."
This was a warning that a Bush presidency would return to the isolationism and xenophobia that is the natural tendency of Republicans. It did not mesh with Clinton's desire for one-world government. A Bush win brought humiliating, unacceptable defeat for the Democrats. So what did Clinton do about it? He must have conspired to bring about the events of 911. As Cliff Kincaid noted, in "...Dollars for Terror, an important book by Swiss television journalist Richard Labeviere, ... presented the thesis that the international Islamic networks linked to bin Laden were nurtured by elements of the U.S. intelligence community, especially during the Clinton years." What is wrong there though, is that the theory assumes a Bin Laden out of control.
Wouldn't a plan make more sense? An operation that would force the Bush presidency to engage overseas, force his administration into military action that would arouse the pacifist tendencies of the Democratic party and reduce the international clout of the United States.
With America weakened as the sole world superpower - who steps into the power void?
The United Nations of course. Headed by none other than Bill Clinton, World leader.
Don't believe it? Are you buying that Clinton is only a "long shot populist candidate" for UN Secretary General Don't bet on it. He may stay low during the election season, but he's already building the foundation for his grab at world power through his Clinton Global Iniative where the Washington Post reported him "assembling his own mini-General Assembly of presidents, prime ministers, kings and other pooh-bahs on Thursday to devise specific plans for addressing poverty, global warming, religious conflict and better governance."
Power you say? If Chimpy McBush could've conspired to increase power and authority over the people of the United States, why couldn't the brillant Clinton team conspire to increase their power and authority over the entire planet? Who do you think would be bigger, "Oil and big money" of the Bushes and bin Ladens, or the world dominating power of Bill as Secretary General and Hillary as President of the United States?
Now there's a conspiracy theory for ya.
UPDATE: Uncle Jimbo has some discussion on Clinton and a link to NBC video about Clinton era tracking of UBL.